Ingarden’s Aesthetic Argument Against Husserl’s Transcendental Idealism Turn
| dc.contributor.author | Jakha, Hicham | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2024-05-21T06:38:52Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2024-05-21T06:38:52Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2023 | |
| dc.description | Related articles: Jakha, Hicham. (2023). Ingarden’s Aesthetic Argument against Husserl’s Transcendental Idealism Turn. Analiza i Egzystencja, 63 (3), 89–108. https://doi.org/10.18276/aie.2023.63-04. The full OA article can be accessed via the following link: https://wnus.usz.edu.pl/aie/en/issue/1246/article/19865/ | |
| dc.description.abstract | This Bibliography covers the list of works which were used to prepare the following research article for publication: Jakha, Hicham. (2023). Ingarden’s Aesthetic Argument against Husserl’s Transcendental Idealism Turn. Analiza i Egzystencja, 63 (3), 89–108. This Bibliography is composed in alphabetical order and includes information about way of access. Husserl’s allegiance to realism came under attack following his Ideas. Ingarden was a fierce critic of his teacher’s turn to transcendental idealism, and provided compelling arguments both for his idealist reading of Husserl and for his rejection of idealism. One of the main arguments Ingarden devised against Husserl’s turn was based on his aesthetics. Against Husserl, Ingarden established literary works and fictional objects as purely intentional objects that are (1) doubly-structured, vis-à-vis their formal ontology, and (2) endowed with spots of indeterminacy. These facts, Ingarden argues, necessitate the transcendence of the purely intentional object. In this paper, I explore his argument, while establishing the ontological foundation on which it rests. | |
| dc.description.sponsorship | This work is supported with a grant from the National Science Centre, Poland (PRELUDIUM 20, grant nr 2021/41/N/HS1/00813). | |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12153/7121 | |
| dc.language.iso | en_US | |
| dc.publisher | ReKUL | |
| dc.rights | CC0 1.0 Universal | en |
| dc.rights.uri | http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ | |
| dc.subject | Roman Ingarden | |
| dc.subject | Edmund Husserl | |
| dc.subject | idealism–realism | |
| dc.subject | phenomenology | |
| dc.subject | aesthetics | |
| dc.subject | idealizm–realizm | |
| dc.subject | fenomenologia | |
| dc.subject | estetyka | |
| dc.title | Ingarden’s Aesthetic Argument Against Husserl’s Transcendental Idealism Turn | |
| dc.type | Dataset |