Procedural Flaws of Shareholders’ Resolutions – a Comparative Approach

dc.contributor.author	Uliasz, Roman
dc.date.accessioned	2023-01-20T11:46:37Z
dc.date.available	2023-01-20T11:46:37Z
dc.date.issued	2022
dc.description.abstract	The paper discusses legal consequences of violations of law which may occur in the course of passing resolutions by shareholders or when convening the meeting. Such violations take the form of procedural infringements, as opposed to material defects which concern the subject matter of the resolution. Several jurisdictions were taken into account in order to demonstrate that illegality of the procedure does not need to imply nullity of resolutions. There are various instruments which, despite illegality, are intended to preserve the resolution. This is all about the balance of preferences: in company law, there are definitely situations where legality should be less valued than stability and certainty.	en
dc.identifier.citation	"Review of European and Comparative Law", 2022, Vol. 51, No. 4, pp. 95-106	en
dc.identifier.doi	10.31743/recl.14607
dc.identifier.issn	2545-384X
dc.identifier.uri	http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12153/4097
dc.language.iso	en	pl
dc.publisher	KUL Publishing House	en
dc.rights	Attribution 4.0 International	*
dc.rights.uri	http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/	*
dc.subject	companies	en
dc.subject	resolutions	en
dc.subject	defects	en
dc.subject	nullity	en
dc.subject	shareholders	en
dc.title	Procedural Flaws of Shareholders’ Resolutions – a Comparative Approach	en
dc.type	info:eu-repo/semantics/article	pl