Categorial heterogenity: Old English determiners
| dc.contributor.author | Bartnik, Artur | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2023-03-27T11:46:28Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2023-03-27T11:46:28Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2007 | |
| dc.description.abstract | This paper examines the syntactic properties of two structures illustrated in (1) and (2): 1) his þone readan gim // his the red gem // ‘his red gem’ / (coblick,HomU_18_[BlHom_1]:9.125.121), 2) þæs his cwides // that his saying // ‘that saying’ / (coblick,LS_17.1_[MartinMor[BlHom_17]]:215.79.2742). Example (1) features a possessive – determiner sequence, which is characterized by the obligatory occurrence of both an adjective and simple determiners of the paradigm se/seo/þæt (Mitchell 1985: §103-112). The reversed order (determiner – possessive) does not display such restrictions. In particular, the adjective is optional and compound determiners (þes/þeos/þis) are also licit in these sequences, as shown in example (2). The analysis proposed in this paper accounts for these facts by assuming that Old English determiners are not a homogeneous group because they combine both adjectival (specifier) and pronominal (head) properties. | pl |
| dc.identifier.citation | "Studia Anglica Posnaniensia", 2007, Vol. 3, s. 75-96 | pl |
| dc.identifier.issn | 0081-6272 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://wa.amu.edu.pl/sap/files/43/04_Bartnik.pdf | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12153/4855 | |
| dc.language.iso | en | pl |
| dc.publisher | Uniwersytet im. Adama Mickiewicza w Poznaniu | pl |
| dc.rights | Uznanie autorstwa-Użycie niekomercyjne-Bez utworów zależnych 3.0 Polska | * |
| dc.rights.uri | http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/pl/ | * |
| dc.title | Categorial heterogenity: Old English determiners | pl |
| dc.type | info:eu-repo/semantics/article | pl |