„Formuła Radbrucha” a „formuła Cathreina”

Potrzeszcz, Jadwiga

„Formuła Radbrucha” a „formuła Cathreina”

dc.contributor.author	Potrzeszcz, Jadwiga
dc.date.accessioned	2022-03-15T12:21:28Z
dc.date.available	2022-03-15T12:21:28Z
dc.date.issued	2011
dc.description.abstract	An analysis of Victor Cathrein’s comment on values and positive law allows one to extract such formulations that can be called, by way of analogy to the Radbruch formula, the Cathrein formula. A comparison of views held by Gustav Radbruch and Victor Cathrein has not been, it seems, a subject of legal-philosophical research. Radbruch himself never directly pointed to his inspiration by Cathrein’s views, although he was well acquainted with the legal-philosophical work entitled: Recht, Naturrecht und positives Recht. Eine kritische Untersuchung der Grundbegriffe der Rechtsordnung (Freinburg im Breisgau, 1901). In 1911, he wrote a review of the second edition of 1909. Although Gustav Radbruch is known as a representative of Baden School of Neo-Kantianism, a fact which obviously refers us to his predecessors and mentors, yet it remains a mystery what the theoretical grounds are for a change in his position, or a “different arrangement of focal points” in the post-war era. He then realigned his theory. From then on, he associated the notion of law with values which were not relative. With regard to the lawmorality relation (whether and under what circumstances positive law may not be applied if it infringes the basic moral principles), Radbruch’s response does not contradict Acquinas’ reply. It seems justified to ask whether Neo-Kantianism still plays any constructive role. With due respect for interpretations of Radbruch’s formula created to date, the presented article attempts an analysis from a different perspective. This Christian perspective, particularly in the context of Cathrein’s views, constitutes the object of the presented study.	pl
dc.identifier.citation	"Roczniki Nauk Prawnych", 2011, T. 21, nr 2, s. 7-40	pl
dc.identifier.issn	1507-7896
dc.identifier.uri	http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12153/2782
dc.language.iso	pl	pl
dc.publisher	Towarzystwo Naukowe KUL, Katolicki Uniwersytet Lubelski Jana Pawła II	pl
dc.rights	Uznanie autorstwa-Użycie niekomercyjne-Bez utworów zależnych 4.0 Międzynarodowe	*
dc.rights.uri	https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/legalcode.pl	*
dc.subject	formuła Radbrucha	pl
dc.subject	ustawowe bezprawie	pl
dc.subject	prawo ponadustawowe	pl
dc.subject	sprawiedliwość	pl
dc.subject	bezpieczeństwo prawne	pl
dc.subject	prawo naturalne	pl
dc.subject	katolicka filozofia prawa	pl
dc.subject	Radbruch’s formula	pl
dc.subject	statutory lawlessness	pl
dc.subject	supra-statutory law	pl
dc.subject	justice	pl
dc.subject	legal security	pl
dc.subject	natural law	pl
dc.subject	Catholic philosophy of law	pl
dc.title	„Formuła Radbrucha” a „formuła Cathreina”	pl
dc.title.alternative	The Radbruch Formula versus Cathrein Formula	pl
dc.type	info:eu-repo/semantics/article	pl