E se Osea non fosse esistito davvero…? Il neostoricismo negli studi biblici contemporanei – prospettive e inquietudini

Simple item page
dc.contributor.authorZawadzki, Arnold
dc.date.accessioned2020-05-08T08:19:18Z
dc.date.available2020-05-08T08:19:18Z
dc.date.issued2020
dc.description.abstractL’articolo presenta un’approfondita revisione del libro di James M. Bos Reconsidering the Date and the Provenance of the Book of Hosea. The Case for the Persian-Period Yehud, sullo sfondo del problema del neostoricismo negli studi biblici. Dopo aver tracciato una breve panoramica sul fenomeno del neostoricismo in generale (la sua genesi e il suo successivo sviluppo nel corso degli anni), viene discusso l’approccio di Bos in base al confronto con tali premesse ideologico-filosofiche. A tal proposito viene presentata in modo dettagliato l’intera struttura del libro di Bos, assieme alla valutazione critica dell’argomentazione da lui addotta. L’autore dell’articolo ritiene che l’approccio neostoricista alla Bibbia sia del tutto soggettivo e sbagliato, in quanto assolutizza un principio filosofico e non lascia spazio per caso, dubbio o fede.pl
dc.description.abstractThe article presents an extended review of James M. Bos’s book Reconsidering the Date and the Provenance of the Book of Hosea. The Case for the Persian-Period Yehud, against the backdrop of the issue of the new historicism in biblical studies. After a brief overview of the phenomenon of this new historicism (its genesis and historical development), Bos’s approach is discussed from the point of view of its ideological-philosophical context. Then a detailed analysis of the entire structure of Bos’s book is presented, along with a critical assessment of his reasoning. The author of the article argues that the new historicist approach is completely subjective and wrong, as it absolutizes a philosophical principle without admitting the element of faith or any possibility of coincidence or doubt.pl
dc.identifier.citation"The Biblical Annals" 2020, T. 10, nr 2, s. 303-326pl
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.31743/biban.5897
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12153/1065
dc.language.isoitpl
dc.publisherWydawnictwo KULpl
dc.rightsUznanie autorstwa-Bez utworów zależnych 3.0 Polska
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/3.0/pl/
dc.subjectneostoricismopl
dc.subjectneostoricismo negli studi biblicipl
dc.subjectOseapl
dc.subjectBospl
dc.subjectperiodo persianopl
dc.subjectLiveranipl
dc.subjectnew historicismpl
dc.subjectnew historicism in biblical studiespl
dc.subjectHoseapl
dc.subjectPersian periodpl
dc.titleE se Osea non fosse esistito davvero…? Il neostoricismo negli studi biblici contemporanei – prospettive e inquietudinipl
dc.title.alternativeWhat If Hosea Hadn’t Actually Existed …? The New Historicism in the Contemporary Biblical Studies – Prospects and Concernspl
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlepl
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Zawadzki_Arnold_E_se_Osea_non_fosse_esistito_davvero.pdf
Size:
819.2 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Download

License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Thumbnail Image
Name:
license.txt
Size:
2.63 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description:
Download

Collections
The Biblical Annals, 2020, Tom 10 (67), Nr 2
Artykuły naukowe (WT)