Hybridités de l’écriture et subversions du sujet : enjeux du simulacre autour de Pierre Klossowski

Simple item page
dc.contributor.authorVaillancourt, Thibaut
dc.date.accessioned2020-06-23T09:15:45Z
dc.date.available2020-06-23T09:15:45Z
dc.date.issued2016
dc.description.abstractWhat can be said of Pierre Klossowski’s works’ hybridism, he who, philosopher, writer, translator and painter, unabashedly claimed to be a « monomaniac » ? This gap brings about a tension between what we call « hybridism » in his writings (to talk about this sole medium) and a coherence in his « obsessions ». Furthermore, hybridism can be inferred from the variety from which his works take their source and the qualities which the remains of the notion of « subject » inherit. Klossowski’s work, itself a non-cartesian anthropology, calls upon theologians, latin classics, as much as so-called « transgressive » philosophers. Hence hybridism, once coupled with the simulacrum, becomes a guiding thread, kindling the word’s etymology (hybris and ibrida), in an « excessive » and « bastardised » style that does away with any form of identity, be that of the writer itself.pl
dc.identifier.citation"Quêtes littéraires" 2016, nº 6, s. 81-90pl
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.31743/ql.215
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12153/1238
dc.language.isofrpl
dc.rightsUznanie autorstwa 4.0 Międzynarodowe
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode.pl
dc.subjectKlossowskipl
dc.subjecthybriditypl
dc.subjectsubjectpl
dc.subjectsimulacrumpl
dc.titleHybridités de l’écriture et subversions du sujet : enjeux du simulacre autour de Pierre Klossowskipl
dc.title.alternativeHybridities of the writing and subversions of the subject: stakes of the simulacrum around Pierre Klossowskipl
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlepl
Files
Collections
Quêtes littéraires, 2016, No 6: Hybride(s)