Ferreiro, Alberto2023-07-072023-07-072023"Vox Patrum", 2023, T. 86, s. 51–74.0860-9411https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12153/5255One of the accusations against Priscillian and his followers was their use of non-canonical books in their writings and teachings. This was proof positive for Priscillian’s opponents that he and his followers were a sect worthy of condemnation and that their writings were tainted with heresy. These accusations are found in several of the Suevic-Visigothic councils of Hispania. it is fortuitous that we have Priscillian’s response to this accusation in his Tractatus III: Priscilliani Liber de Fide et de Apocryphis. In this work Priscillian wrote a spirited and proficient defense against his adversaries.enAttribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internationalhttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/PriscillianVisigothic CouncilsI EnochEpistle of JudeOld Testament ApocryphaTractatus IIILiber de fide et de ApocryphisNew Testament Apocryphainfo:eu-repo/semantics/article10.31743/vp.14941