Kaczmarczyk, Hubert2022-02-042022-02-042021"Review of European and Comparative Law", 2021, T. 46, nr 3, s. 93-107http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12153/2221The article presents an opinion in the discussion on the limits of judicial activism. The active attitude of judges in the law-making process according to the so-called concept of ‘pro-constitutional interpretation of the law’ can be observed more and more often. While we may agree with the view that the role of a judge is to pronounce a fair verdict based on the applicable law and judges may give meaning to statutory provisions supplemented with an axiology of the Constitution, the problem appears with particular sharpness when such a pro-constitutional interpretation leads to a specific application of the provisions contra legem.enAttribution 4.0 Internationalhttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/judicial activismlimits of legal interpretationpro-constitutional interpretation of statutesinfo:eu-repo/semantics/article10.31743/recl.12330