Cotfas, Maria Aurelia2026-02-022026-02-022025"LingBaW. Linguistics Beyond and Within", 2025, Vol. 11, pp. 53-68.2450-5188https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12153/9204The paper looks at the possibility of Partial Control (henceforth, PC) instances in Romanian, a language which uses finite (subjunctive) complements in typical control contexts and where PC has therefore been deemed impossible. We show that PC effects can indeed be manifested in Romanian under a putea ‘can’, which we analyze as a neutral circumstantial modal in these contexts. We show, following Matsuda (2021), that these PC instances are sensitive to indexicality (viz., the current speech situation) and represent an interplay of (inclusion of) [+Speaker], [+Addressee] or both. We therefore identify three typical PC instances: a) 1st singular antecedent + 1st plural embedded reference (inclusion of current speaker); b) 2nd singular antecedent + 2nd plural embedded subject (inclusion of Addressee) and c) 2nd singular antecedent + 1st plural embedded subject (inclusion of both). This shows that in spite of the raising behaviour of most O(bligatory)C(ontrol)/E(xaustive) C(ontrol) verbs in Romanian (cf. Alboiu 2007, Cotfas 2012), there are contexts for which a control analysis needs to be maintained, and, more broadly, that PRO is to be maintained as an empty category and cannot be reduced to raising/movement.enAttribution 4.0 Internationalhttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Romanianfinite controlpartial controlinfinitive complementsubjunctive complementindexicalityassociative semanticsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/article10.31743/lingbaw.18365